Algae: Fuels and CO2 Sequestration
by Michael Hutagalung on 11/12/08 at 2:26 am | 5 Comments | |
A brief explanation about algae utilization to produce vegetable oils, fuels, and to sequester carbon dioxide at the same time, by Glen Kertz, the CEO of Valcent Products USA.
All we have is a closed-loop photo bio-reactor. Our goal is to produce the greatest amount of biomass from algae that we can. By going vertical we believe that we can increase the yield by increasing the surface area and the volume of material getting exposed to sunlight. We have a system that continually recycles, it’s a dynamic system, in a closed-loop.
Algae goes down, starts out of a tank, gets picked up by pumps, goes up into the reactors, and then gravity heights control, lose it to the reactors, get exposed to sunlight, go back into the tank, and the cycle repeated over and over again. Algae is the fastest organism, fastest growing plant on the planet. And it sequesters the greatest amount of carbon dioxide, but in the same time, it produces lipids, basically vegetable oils, and a lot of it. So, if you look at a single-cell of algae in the right species, as much as 50% of its body weight is high-grade vegetable oil. So while we are sequestering carbon dioxide, we are also producing these high-grade lipids that can be used for a variety of purposes.
The beauty of the algae is the fact that we can actually be selective about what carbon chains are coming out of it. So for example, if you want to make jet fuel, we could give you a strain of algae that’s going to make the carbon chains necessary to manufacture jet fuel much more efficiently that you can in the other crop. If you want to make diesel for a truck, we can give you the carbon chains that are ideal for that. We can tailor the lipids based on the species of algae that we are growing.
If I grow an acre of corn and I’m looking at it from the stand point of producing oil, I can grow about 18 gallons of oil per acre per year. Moving up to the most prevalent, palm, we can get 7,800 gallons per acre per year; algae can go up to 20,000 gallons of oil per acre per year. And that’s just from the open-surface system, and not from the closed bio-reactor system.
The problem with the open-surface system is that one: once the algae starts growing, light will only penetrate about an inch or an inch and a half to the surface; it blocks light from the rest of the surface. We also have an enormous amount of water evaporation so we’re losing enormous amount of water that causing us to replace. And third most critical thing to us, we get contaminants from other algae species that flowed from the atmosphere and landed there and become competitive with the algae that we want to grow.
We would try to recapture every drop of water that we can. And the only water we lose is what actually bound up in the algae and goes into the oil itself and the byproduct from the algae. And once we’ve extracted the oil, we can even use the byproduct for feedstock, for sour remediation to make fertilizer, or we can ferment it and produce ethanol out of that.
If we took one-tenth of the State of New Mexico and convert it to algae production, we could meet all the energy demands for the entire United States.
This video is co-provided by YouTube. If you experience errors playing the video, check you Internet connection. The video needs a high speed DSL/Broadband connection. To avoid lag times when playing the video, click the play button and let your Internet browser cache the video. Re-play after the video has been cached completely.


5 Comments
John
Dec 11th, 2008
It may look very promising, indeed. But converting 1/10 of the State of New Mexico is not a good idea either. The world will always demand energy, that’s the fact. If demand is already met, industry will grow, and another demand will come into place. So then, should we convert another another state to algae production? The same happens with biofuels from corn, palm, etc.
But I personally reckon this idea as a better substitution for usual crops. We get higher yield, higher efficiency, and less area are needed for the production. Indonesia should’ve seen this solution as the alternative.
michaeljubel
Dec 11th, 2008
I agree with you on some points that industry will always force us to increase the world’s energy supply but in fact that is how civilization grows. Inconvenient fact we may see, but I reckon it as an ambivalent thing as it brings both positive and negative effect to the world.
And this is surely a substitution for conventional biomass. Corn, palm, and etc profoundly need a huge area of plantation and comparing the yield of oil produced, algae greatly outnumbers those crops with its major advantages.
Arosenbaum21
Jan 5th, 2009
well… i say we better do something…. watch this video its very simple. and states that we HAVE TO do something ASAP
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zORv8wwiadQ&NR=1
Wulan
Aug 1st, 2009
Whoa, algae for fuels and CO2 sequestration is a whole new idea for me, sounds very promising, though. The researcher here compare the oil amount produced by various crops, but what about the heating value? is it all the same? Does the heating value from vegetable oil coming from algae is about the same or maybe, just maybe, a lot less than the others?? Cause what we need is the energy really, not only how much gallon it can produce.
M S
Dec 2nd, 2009
Kalau boleh tau ada perusahaan atau investor di indonesia yang sudah bersedia melakukan penelitian algae terhadap food versus biofuel/diesel?? kalau ada tolong diinformasikan karena sedikit saya punya pengalaman di bidang ini. Terima kasih
Utk informasi banyak obat/supplement mahal/medicine memakai extract algae sebagai raw material…di samping peneliatian untuk biofuel/diesel
Thanks
email saya : anugrah_joshindo@yahoo.co.id
Leave a Comment